The Report of the ANITEPAM-Sponsored Consultation on African Women in Theological Education
January 9-13, 1998, Harare, Zimbabwe
ANITEPAM is the African Network of Institutions of Theological Education Preparing Anglicans for Ministry
The ANITEPAM-sponsored Consultation of African Women in Theological Education met to provide a sense of support, solidarity and sisterhood among women who often work in isolation from one another in theological colleges in Africa. As a first time ever event for Anglican women, we have created space in order to hear from one another and identify key issues we face. We have been discerning ways we can sustain our ministries through our own efforts and with the help of groups like ANITEPAM.
We want to thank ANITEPAM and United Thank Offering Programme of the Episcopal Church women, Episcopal Church, USA for a special grant, as well as the Companions in World Mission, Diocese of Washington, D.C., USA for the material support which has made our work together in this consultation possible.
Our overall goal, through this report is to share the work accomplished at this consultation, to provide a framework for our continuing efforts, and to communicate as African women in theological education with the Anglican communion, partner-churches and others our concerns and our vision for our work in ministries.
Consultation participants represented clergy, law women, and Church Army Sisters involved in various aspects of theological education within the Anglican Church of Africa--teachers, administrators, advanced degree and university students, and international church partners. We have come from the following countries: Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho, South Africa, Uganda, Tanzania, Zimbabwe, Canada and the United States.

During the consultation, participants addressed four major themes and several sub-topics as well as engaging in important story-telling, Bible study and prayer, and examination of our situation as women in theological education. Groups of women made formal panel presentations to challenge participants, followed by group discussions and identification of issues, needs and action steps. The following sections outline these major themes, concerns and directions for the future.
Our panelists observed that a key issue about the current situation in theological education is that theological education is the province of men and is male-dominated. To illustrate this problem, we offer the following examples provided by participants.
Example A. Historically and currently, theological education has been structured for preparation for ordination exclusively. although women have recently received the right to ordination in a few areas, the reality is that most African women are barred from the prospect of ordination. This continues to perpetuate theological education as preparation for the ordination of men, excluding most women and even men who do not seek ordination but theological education in order to fulfill their call to ministry.
Example B. After surveying the colleges represented, it was clear that women are still token participants in theological education as teachers and as students.
The discussion led the group to two major affirmations regarding the vision for theological education in Africa.
First, theological education must be relevant to the contemporary realities of Africa--general violence, civil war, and the creation of refugees in society, and especially the physical, political, social and economic violence against women. We stress that relevancy also means assisting African peoples in the goal of Christian life, that is, living abundantly.
Second, theological education must be inclusive of the perspectives of women, participation of women, and issues impacting women. Our vision for theological education, therefore, entails the following:
The participants discussed our individual and collective roles as women in theological education. Two issues discussed, the male-dominance of theological education and the need for the de-colonization of the Bible, as well as women's and men's minds, have been addressed above. However, several other critical areas of concern were debated--women's commitment to study and to write for the theological curriculum and the Church, and the need for solidarity with women in the struggle for justice in other areas of African society.
In discussing this aspect, the participants observed that, like women in other professions, they faced the challenge of fulfilling the expectations of society on them as wives and mothers. These expectations create exploitation of women's labor at home and in the workplace. Further, these expectations mean that women work twice as hard as do men, have to be twice as qualified than men to do the same job, and receive less pay than men for the same work. One illustration indicates that highly- or over-qualified women seeking teaching positions in theological education are given jobs as secretaries or bookstore clerks rather than classroom positions.
A second challenge raised by participants was the literal interpretation of the Bible which is used in the churches and which influences the theological curriculum(s) currently in use in theological colleges. The literal interpretation of the bible, just like cultural traditions, are used to exploit and oppress women.
Further, the consultation discussed and stressed the problem of sexual violence in the church and in the wider community. Female staff and students in theological institutions have been subjected to sexual violence, inter alia at the hands of Church leaders, which is not treated as a crime. Such violence is rather blamed on the women. Lack of procedures and systems through which women would seek help from sexual violence has meant that most women suffer silently.
In case of sexual violence or pregnancy, gender was used to determine discipline, and in which case women were most adversely affected. In the case of student pregnancy, the female student involved would be discharged from the institution or job while no action was taken against the male student involved.
Yet another challenge is faced by women who are afforded the opportunity to study abroad. They face further challenges in as mush as they face alienation from their support groups at home. They run the risk that they are, in the view of some at home, "westernized" and "overeducated."
The Consultation heard presentations about the work and structure of ANITEPAM and the possible structures available to participants from the newly organization International Anglican Women's Network (IAWN) and seminaries in the West.
The IAWN links together all Anglican women worldwide. It is rooted in prayer, and seeks to participate in church life as a transforming agent. The Beijing Platform for Action is accepted as a norm for women's rights by the Network. Its goal is to enable every person to be liberated by the Gospel.
It is one of eight networks which act as resources to the Anglican Consultative Council (ACC). When a group of Anglican women, through research, dialogue and analysis have concluded that there are issues that need to be taken seriously by the Lambeth Conference and the ACC, it may communicate such issues to the IAWN coordinator. African women in theological education can write to: Liz Barnes, Anglican Women's Fellowship, PO Box 304, Auchland Park 2006, South Africa. Telephone fax: c/o Jenny Frye, 27-21-790-1029.
A presentation was then given on the structures of women's studies programs in religion in the United States. Four program models were outlined which can be viewed in two ways. first, these models can serve as clues that African women in theological education can use in creating possibilities in and for their own contests to develop course syllabi, to design African-appropriate women studies programs, and to transform the theological curriculum. Second, these models can offer insight and help to African women in their search and decision-making when considering studying in U.S. seminaries and graduate schools of religion. The four models follow:
Crucial to a holistic struggle for justice for women in church and society, women in theological education in Africa believe that it is fundamentally important to be in solidarity with others and not just ourselves. The aim of the ministry, our ministries, and our involvement in theological education is to reach out for others, for justice, and for the liberation of the whole of humanity. We must not do theology then in isolation of other people. Our concerns are local, national, continental and global, and indeed, the entire Realm of God. This is why many people are interested and willing to be co-partners with us or to work with us. As the Baganda people say, "We enjoy meals only when we are sharing with others." This saying highlights the significance of participating and being in solidarity with others. Therefore, it is our responsibility to work out plans and ways in which we can be in solidarity with others so as to implement our goals. Ways we must work include:
We affirm that TEE is a prime example of the potential purpose of theological education--the theological education and training of the laity so that they can fulfill their ministry. And further, that TEE has the potential for theologically educating professional women, women in the home and women farmers, and can thus be used to struggle against women's oppressive socialization. In that case, we must pursue the following:
The Consultation affirms that solidarity with others must include women in theological education addressing the following:
We must address the issue of HIV/AIDS as it oppresses women in African societies. We must also condemn the stigmatization of victims of AIDS through the following:
Our work as a growing, energetic network of African women in theological education in Africa is just beginning at this new level, and we are excited! Because we have been able to so deeply get to know one another in Christian sisterhood and solidarity, and have discovered and collectively brought to light the depth of our situations as African women in theological education in Africa, we now know that this consultation cannot be only one historical moment. We make two calls:
We call upon ANITEPAM and our church partners to enable and resource a next meeting of African women in theological education in Africa in January, 2000, in West Africa; we suggest Ghana.
We call for the election and consecration of an African woman bishop by the year 2000 as we enter the Third Millennium in the Reign of Jesus Christ!
As we brought the consultation to a close, participants reminded themselves and each other of a fundamental insight reiterated throughout the meeting:
We must commit ourselves to the transformation of the Church and we must remember that we too are part of the Church, the Body of Christ Jesus!
Thus, the work we have set out for ourselves in relation to the Anglican Church, our church partners, our theological colleges, and our African societies is and will be part of our ministries for the love of the Church and in faithfulness to Jesus Christ.
We commit ourselves to a transformational church, a community of equals in the church of women and men, and one which models God's peace, love, and justice for the whole world.
Therefore, we commit ourselves to this framework and to this road of action.